<?xml version="1.0" encoding="UTF-8"?><rss version="2.0"
	xmlns:content="http://purl.org/rss/1.0/modules/content/"
	xmlns:dc="http://purl.org/dc/elements/1.1/"
	xmlns:atom="http://www.w3.org/2005/Atom"
	xmlns:sy="http://purl.org/rss/1.0/modules/syndication/"
	xmlns:georss="http://www.georss.org/georss" xmlns:geo="http://www.w3.org/2003/01/geo/wgs84_pos#" xmlns:media="http://search.yahoo.com/mrss/"
		>
<channel>
	<title>Comments on: XML as a Better Wha&#8230;?</title>
	<atom:link href="http://benzilla.galbraiths.org/2007/02/08/xml-as-a-better-wha/feed/" rel="self" type="application/rss+xml" />
	<link>http://benzilla.galbraiths.org/2007/02/08/xml-as-a-better-wha/</link>
	<description>Ben is Vice President of Mobile Engineering at Walmart.com, where he works closely with his long-time friend Dion Almaer.</description>
	<lastBuildDate>Wed, 25 Jan 2012 19:56:40 +0000</lastBuildDate>
	<sy:updatePeriod>hourly</sy:updatePeriod>
	<sy:updateFrequency>1</sy:updateFrequency>
	<generator>http://wordpress.com/</generator>
	<item>
		<title>By: Ben Galbraith</title>
		<link>http://benzilla.galbraiths.org/2007/02/08/xml-as-a-better-wha/#comment-2497</link>
		<dc:creator><![CDATA[Ben Galbraith]]></dc:creator>
		<pubDate>Wed, 14 Mar 2007 04:05:53 +0000</pubDate>
		<guid isPermaLink="false">http://galbraiths.org/blog/?p=70#comment-2497</guid>
		<description><![CDATA[Bryan: Yeah, DSLs: good. But if you read ChrisA&#039;s blog entry, you&#039;ll see he&#039;s talking about using XAML as a general-purpose C# replacement.]]></description>
		<content:encoded><![CDATA[<p>Bryan: Yeah, DSLs: good. But if you read ChrisA&#8217;s blog entry, you&#8217;ll see he&#8217;s talking about using XAML as a general-purpose C# replacement.</p>
]]></content:encoded>
	</item>
	<item>
		<title>By: Bryan Young</title>
		<link>http://benzilla.galbraiths.org/2007/02/08/xml-as-a-better-wha/#comment-2496</link>
		<dc:creator><![CDATA[Bryan Young]]></dc:creator>
		<pubDate>Tue, 13 Mar 2007 20:29:30 +0000</pubDate>
		<guid isPermaLink="false">http://galbraiths.org/blog/?p=70#comment-2496</guid>
		<description><![CDATA[Hopefully he means that XAML is better than C# at solving a very specific problem which happens to be well suited for a declarative language - drawing a UI.  His description goes on to talk about other domains it could be applied to... all of which might benefit from a declarative language.

If those technologies never venture into procedural code, and the developer doesn&#039;t have to directly interact with the XML, I could see XAML being better than C#... for that single task.]]></description>
		<content:encoded><![CDATA[<p>Hopefully he means that XAML is better than C# at solving a very specific problem which happens to be well suited for a declarative language &#8211; drawing a UI.  His description goes on to talk about other domains it could be applied to&#8230; all of which might benefit from a declarative language.</p>
<p>If those technologies never venture into procedural code, and the developer doesn&#8217;t have to directly interact with the XML, I could see XAML being better than C#&#8230; for that single task.</p>
]]></content:encoded>
	</item>
</channel>
</rss>

