<?xml version="1.0" encoding="UTF-8"?><rss version="2.0"
	xmlns:content="http://purl.org/rss/1.0/modules/content/"
	xmlns:dc="http://purl.org/dc/elements/1.1/"
	xmlns:atom="http://www.w3.org/2005/Atom"
	xmlns:sy="http://purl.org/rss/1.0/modules/syndication/"
	xmlns:georss="http://www.georss.org/georss" xmlns:geo="http://www.w3.org/2003/01/geo/wgs84_pos#" xmlns:media="http://search.yahoo.com/mrss/"
		>
<channel>
	<title>Comments on: Desktop Matters: Final Wrap-up</title>
	<atom:link href="http://benzilla.galbraiths.org/2007/03/13/desktop-matters-final-wrap-up/feed/" rel="self" type="application/rss+xml" />
	<link>http://benzilla.galbraiths.org/2007/03/13/desktop-matters-final-wrap-up/</link>
	<description></description>
	<lastBuildDate>Wed, 10 Mar 2010 18:18:30 +0000</lastBuildDate>
	<generator>http://wordpress.com/</generator>
	<sy:updatePeriod>hourly</sy:updatePeriod>
	<sy:updateFrequency>1</sy:updateFrequency>
		<item>
		<title>By: vintage hair styles</title>
		<link>http://benzilla.galbraiths.org/2007/03/13/desktop-matters-final-wrap-up/#comment-2653</link>
		<dc:creator>vintage hair styles</dc:creator>
		<pubDate>Mon, 09 Apr 2007 12:08:39 +0000</pubDate>
		<guid isPermaLink="false">http://galbraiths.org/blog/2007/03/13/desktop-matters-final-wrap-up/#comment-2653</guid>
		<description>hair styles choppy &lt;a href=&quot;http://ipoo.org/5c2v&quot; rel=&quot;nofollow&quot;&gt;new styles hair&lt;/a&gt;</description>
		<content:encoded><![CDATA[<p>hair styles choppy <a href="http://ipoo.org/5c2v" rel="nofollow">new styles hair</a></p>
]]></content:encoded>
	</item>
	<item>
		<title>By: On .net client stuff.. : Desktop matters conference report ..</title>
		<link>http://benzilla.galbraiths.org/2007/03/13/desktop-matters-final-wrap-up/#comment-2652</link>
		<dc:creator>On .net client stuff.. : Desktop matters conference report ..</dc:creator>
		<pubDate>Wed, 14 Mar 2007 20:34:49 +0000</pubDate>
		<guid isPermaLink="false">http://galbraiths.org/blog/2007/03/13/desktop-matters-final-wrap-up/#comment-2652</guid>
		<description>[...] Desktop matters conference report .. Tim Sneath (&nbsp;my work boss)&nbsp;&nbsp;emailed me asking how it went , and since I am typing if for my team I thought: &quot;what the heck ... just publish it...&quot;  I had the pleasure of attending and presenting at Desktop Matters last Friday .. It is the &quot;hard-corest&quot; Java conference I have ever attended (disclaimer, I have only attended 2 java conferences: JavaOne and OSCON) ...&nbsp; The conference focuses on client java technologies,&nbsp; a lot of people from Sun&#039;s Java2D and Swing team presented..&nbsp; Also, some influentials building interesting java stuff..  Here are my thoughts:  On the conference: it was awesome...&nbsp;A small group of Java influentials talking with the Java leaders (Hans Muller, Chet Haase,&nbsp; Richard Bair, etc.)&nbsp;.. there was nothing held back either direction.. The Sun team shared challenges and road-map... the community provided good feedback.. I had a blast and learned a lot ...&nbsp;&nbsp; Read some of their reports here.. The event reminded me of what at Microsoft we call Software Design Reviews ( SDRs ) ... Some of you reading this post might have attended one of these ...&nbsp; You know that it is hard to buy that kind of access, well on the Java client community you might have the answer in this conference..&nbsp;&nbsp; A nice touch different from the SDR was Ben Galbraith the organizer who kept it light .. making equal fun of every one there&nbsp;  On Java SE and Swing:&nbsp; I was surprised and (as a technologist) happy to see progress on java and Swing ; their &#039;filthy rich&#039; demos looked pretty good ; That said, I still think they are very far behind Microsoft (both Windows forms but specially WPF) in tooling, customization, richness, etc..&nbsp; You can definitely do good stuff on Java, if you are willing to write a bit of code or hire experienced devs..&nbsp; [yes, I&nbsp;of course acknowledge they do it for the cross-platform promise.. if you must go x-platform and can&#039;t go AJAX, I think that is one of the best choices out there]  On my presentation/message: When I arrived, I had a deck with 40 slides covering the ins of WPF ( templates, styles, resources, etc.)&nbsp; by the second day I had changed it&nbsp; based on a private conversation with Hans Muller - I pitched him on XAML and he seemed overwhelmed with properties, triggers, styles, etc.. but he really got the &quot;oh, makes better tools&quot; idea..  So, in the end, I presented a simple (much slower-paced ): &nbsp;  Why is MS doing WPF..?&nbsp;&nbsp;&nbsp; It is ALL about User Experience; I elaborated&nbsp;that UX is business value to the everyone. On day 1, the Java folks listed why write client software and the list was usability, richness, performance, leverage local resources, etc..&nbsp;&nbsp; most of these are factors of user experience.. so it resonated.. UX is also business value for the Dev/ISV/SI selling the solution... It provides differentiation opportunity,&nbsp;branding, pride of ownership, etc.&nbsp;&nbsp; How is MS we improving UX with WPF?&nbsp;&nbsp;  Integration of all our UI Stacks ( Text, 2D, 3D, Video, etc.) Declaratively;&nbsp; we invested in a declarative model to optimize toolability and fully incorporate the designer role into application development .. this is the silver bullet in the long-run; along with rich services to embrace the declarative modell...  What are we doing on x-platform? (IMHO)&nbsp; WPF/E is a huge step for Microsoft. Not because of what we are delivering in Version1, but because it is a commitment to innovate in client software that runs x-platform.&nbsp;&nbsp;&nbsp; MS is best positioned [we have the framework, WPF, XAML, etc. to act quickly in that space, since we have a lot of the lessons learned - and the code ;) I did two demos:   The Healthcare demo I was short on time and wanted to keep it focused -- check for a post on that demo later today or tomorrow there is some good news there--..&nbsp; I think this summarizes well WPF integration since it shows most UI stacks..&nbsp;&nbsp; I spend 15 to 20 mins in Expression blend building stuff from scratch ;   created the data templates for the healthcare demo ...&nbsp; and created a 3D button with animation ( triggers on mouse over)&nbsp; ...&nbsp; the latter was mostly to make explain how we compare to Chet&#039;s animation engine for his book...  The feedbackI was very surprised on the &#039;kudos&#039; ... Quite a few people came to me afterwards and shared kind thoughts...&nbsp;&nbsp; I got a lot of &quot;I get your experience message&quot;;&nbsp; and &quot;I love what WPF can do&quot;, &quot;XAML seems very neat&quot;, etc..&nbsp;&nbsp;  My best two take aways...&nbsp;&nbsp;&nbsp;   An interesting cross-platform combo in the interim? : While sitting there listening to their challenges, goals, etc. and after receiving the feedback on my presentation I was thinking...&nbsp; what if &quot;XAML was a standard&quot; and the Java community embraced it to create UI? ....&nbsp; They could keep their performant cross platform engine .. but use our tooling to create rich apps&quot; .... does it sound crazy??&nbsp;&nbsp; I think it is a good interim while MS gets a strong x-platform client out (if we ever do, I can&#039;t confirm nor deny, only hope )...&nbsp;&nbsp; The type of apps these folks are writing requires rich development frameworks, rich programming languages, and powerful drawing engines...&nbsp;&nbsp; I can&#039;t think of a good solution for that today if you include a good tooling/debug story.  Some lower hanging, more realistic&nbsp;takeaway for Microsoft: I think we need to re-visit simple styles and create several &quot;cool&quot; versions of simple styles...&nbsp;&nbsp;&nbsp;We have the designer tools.. but there will be teams out there that do not have designers.. We need to pony up for a few good design templates that developers can use to create &quot;cool looking apps&quot; with out a lot of designer support...&nbsp; If MS provides &nbsp;styled primitives then developers could put screens build on these simple styled controls...&nbsp;&nbsp; For example,&nbsp; I recently downloaded the &quot;Roxio&quot; client, nice gradients, stylish controls, yet nothing extreme (other than a few cool vector graphics that could have been images) ..&nbsp;&nbsp; I think with &quot;cool simple styles&quot; this could be accomplish with out much design work...&nbsp;&nbsp; &nbsp; That is it ...&nbsp; I hope the conference repeats next year ....&nbsp; If it does,&nbsp; I would recommend it if you are a Java client developer ...I also hope I don&#039;t get fired for a post w/ the word java so much ...&nbsp;My first test to see how far I can take it ....  Published Wednesday, March 14, 2007 1:28 PM by jaimer Filed under: Windows Presentation Foundation, Personal, Client in general , blend [...]</description>
		<content:encoded><![CDATA[<p>[...] Desktop matters conference report .. Tim Sneath (&#38;nbsp;my work boss)&#38;nbsp;&#38;nbsp;emailed me asking how it went , and since I am typing if for my team I thought: &#8220;what the heck &#8230; just publish it&#8230;&#8221;  I had the pleasure of attending and presenting at Desktop Matters last Friday .. It is the &#8220;hard-corest&#8221; Java conference I have ever attended (disclaimer, I have only attended 2 java conferences: JavaOne and OSCON) &#8230;&#38;nbsp; The conference focuses on client java technologies,&#38;nbsp; a lot of people from Sun&#8217;s Java2D and Swing team presented..&#38;nbsp; Also, some influentials building interesting java stuff..  Here are my thoughts:  On the conference: it was awesome&#8230;&#38;nbsp;A small group of Java influentials talking with the Java leaders (Hans Muller, Chet Haase,&#38;nbsp; Richard Bair, etc.)&#38;nbsp;.. there was nothing held back either direction.. The Sun team shared challenges and road-map&#8230; the community provided good feedback.. I had a blast and learned a lot &#8230;&#38;nbsp;&#38;nbsp; Read some of their reports here.. The event reminded me of what at Microsoft we call Software Design Reviews ( SDRs ) &#8230; Some of you reading this post might have attended one of these &#8230;&#38;nbsp; You know that it is hard to buy that kind of access, well on the Java client community you might have the answer in this conference..&#38;nbsp;&#38;nbsp; A nice touch different from the SDR was Ben Galbraith the organizer who kept it light .. making equal fun of every one there&#38;nbsp;  On Java SE and Swing:&#38;nbsp; I was surprised and (as a technologist) happy to see progress on java and Swing ; their &#8216;filthy rich&#8217; demos looked pretty good ; That said, I still think they are very far behind Microsoft (both Windows forms but specially WPF) in tooling, customization, richness, etc..&#38;nbsp; You can definitely do good stuff on Java, if you are willing to write a bit of code or hire experienced devs..&#38;nbsp; [yes, I&#38;nbsp;of course acknowledge they do it for the cross-platform promise.. if you must go x-platform and can't go AJAX, I think that is one of the best choices out there]  On my presentation/message: When I arrived, I had a deck with 40 slides covering the ins of WPF ( templates, styles, resources, etc.)&#38;nbsp; by the second day I had changed it&#38;nbsp; based on a private conversation with Hans Muller &#8211; I pitched him on XAML and he seemed overwhelmed with properties, triggers, styles, etc.. but he really got the &#8220;oh, makes better tools&#8221; idea..  So, in the end, I presented a simple (much slower-paced ): &#38;nbsp;  Why is MS doing WPF..?&#38;nbsp;&#38;nbsp;&#38;nbsp; It is ALL about User Experience; I elaborated&#38;nbsp;that UX is business value to the everyone. On day 1, the Java folks listed why write client software and the list was usability, richness, performance, leverage local resources, etc..&#38;nbsp;&#38;nbsp; most of these are factors of user experience.. so it resonated.. UX is also business value for the Dev/ISV/SI selling the solution&#8230; It provides differentiation opportunity,&#38;nbsp;branding, pride of ownership, etc.&#38;nbsp;&#38;nbsp; How is MS we improving UX with WPF?&#38;nbsp;&#38;nbsp;  Integration of all our UI Stacks ( Text, 2D, 3D, Video, etc.) Declaratively;&#38;nbsp; we invested in a declarative model to optimize toolability and fully incorporate the designer role into application development .. this is the silver bullet in the long-run; along with rich services to embrace the declarative modell&#8230;  What are we doing on x-platform? (IMHO)&#38;nbsp; WPF/E is a huge step for Microsoft. Not because of what we are delivering in Version1, but because it is a commitment to innovate in client software that runs x-platform.&#38;nbsp;&#38;nbsp;&#38;nbsp; MS is best positioned [we have the framework, WPF, XAML, etc. to act quickly in that space, since we have a lot of the lessons learned - and the code <img src='http://s.wordpress.com/wp-includes/images/smilies/icon_wink.gif' alt=';)' class='wp-smiley' />  I did two demos:   The Healthcare demo I was short on time and wanted to keep it focused -- check for a post on that demo later today or tomorrow there is some good news there--..&#38;nbsp; I think this summarizes well WPF integration since it shows most UI stacks..&#38;nbsp;&#38;nbsp; I spend 15 to 20 mins in Expression blend building stuff from scratch ;   created the data templates for the healthcare demo ...&#38;nbsp; and created a 3D button with animation ( triggers on mouse over)&#38;nbsp; ...&#38;nbsp; the latter was mostly to make explain how we compare to Chet's animation engine for his book...  The feedbackI was very surprised on the 'kudos' ... Quite a few people came to me afterwards and shared kind thoughts...&#38;nbsp;&#38;nbsp; I got a lot of "I get your experience message";&#38;nbsp; and "I love what WPF can do", "XAML seems very neat", etc..&#38;nbsp;&#38;nbsp;  My best two take aways...&#38;nbsp;&#38;nbsp;&#38;nbsp;   An interesting cross-platform combo in the interim? : While sitting there listening to their challenges, goals, etc. and after receiving the feedback on my presentation I was thinking...&#38;nbsp; what if "XAML was a standard" and the Java community embraced it to create UI? ....&#38;nbsp; They could keep their performant cross platform engine .. but use our tooling to create rich apps" .... does it sound crazy??&#38;nbsp;&#38;nbsp; I think it is a good interim while MS gets a strong x-platform client out (if we ever do, I can't confirm nor deny, only hope )...&#38;nbsp;&#38;nbsp; The type of apps these folks are writing requires rich development frameworks, rich programming languages, and powerful drawing engines...&#38;nbsp;&#38;nbsp; I can't think of a good solution for that today if you include a good tooling/debug story.  Some lower hanging, more realistic&#38;nbsp;takeaway for Microsoft: I think we need to re-visit simple styles and create several "cool" versions of simple styles...&#38;nbsp;&#38;nbsp;&#38;nbsp;We have the designer tools.. but there will be teams out there that do not have designers.. We need to pony up for a few good design templates that developers can use to create "cool looking apps" with out a lot of designer support...&#38;nbsp; If MS provides &#38;nbsp;styled primitives then developers could put screens build on these simple styled controls...&#38;nbsp;&#38;nbsp; For example,&#38;nbsp; I recently downloaded the "Roxio" client, nice gradients, stylish controls, yet nothing extreme (other than a few cool vector graphics that could have been images) ..&#38;nbsp;&#38;nbsp; I think with "cool simple styles" this could be accomplish with out much design work...&#38;nbsp;&#38;nbsp; &#38;nbsp; That is it ...&#38;nbsp; I hope the conference repeats next year ....&#38;nbsp; If it does,&#38;nbsp; I would recommend it if you are a Java client developer ...I also hope I don't get fired for a post w/ the word java so much ...&#38;nbsp;My first test to see how far I can take it ....  Published Wednesday, March 14, 2007 1:28 PM by jaimer Filed under: Windows Presentation Foundation, Personal, Client in general , blend [...]</p>
]]></content:encoded>
	</item>
</channel>
</rss>
